Washington's Engineer Read online

  WASHINGTON’S ENGINEER

  WASHINGTON’S ENGINEER

  Louis Duportail and the Creation of an Army Corps

  NORMAN DESMARAIS

  An imprint of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.

  4501 Forbes Blvd., Ste. 200

  Lanham, MD 20706

  www.rowman.com

  Distributed by NATIONAL BOOK NETWORK

  Copyright © 2021 by Norman Desmarais

  All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review.

  British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available

  Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

  Names: Desmarais, Norman, author.

  Title: Washington’s engineer : Louis Duportail and the creation of an Army Corps / Norman Desmarais.

  Other titles: Louis Duportail and the creation of an Army Corps

  Description: Lanham, MD : Prometheus Books, 2021. | Includes bibliographical references and index. | Summary: “This is a unique biography about an overlooked, even obscure, French officer that was instrumental in the American cause for independence. As a complete biography, it covers Louis Deuportail’s time as the first Commandant of the Army Corps of Engineers, his return to France, and his service in the French army.”—Provided by publisher.

  Identifiers: LCCN 2020033020 (print) | LCCN 2020033021 (ebook) | ISBN 9781633886568 (cloth) | ISBN 9781633886575 (epub)

  Subjects: LCSH: Duportail, Antoine-Jean-Louis Le Bègue de Presle, 1743–1802. | United States—History—Revolution, 1775–1783—Campaigns. | United States—History—Revolution, 1775–1783—Engineering and construction. | United States. Continental Army. Corps of Engineers—History. | United States—History—Revolution, 1775–1783—Participation, French. | Generals—France—Biography.

  Classification: LCC E207.D9 D47 2021 (print) | LCC E207.D9 (ebook) | DDC 973.3092 [B]—dc23

  LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020033020

  LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020033021

  The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992.

  I have a high opinion of his merit and abilities, and esteem him not only well acquainted with the particular branch he professes, but a man of sound judgment and real knowledge in military science in general.

  —George Washington, in a letter to the president of Congress, November 16, 1778 (Washington, Papers, 18:168)

  CONTENTS

  Cover

  HalfTitle

  Title

  Copyright

  Contents

  Introduction

  1 Early Years

  2 Valley Forge

  3 West Point and the Hudson

  4 The Campaign of 1779

  5 The Campaign of 1780: Charleston

  6 The Corps of Engineers

  7 Prisoners of War

  8 The Campaign of 1781: Yorktown

  9 Peace

  10 American Citizen and Farmer

  Appendix A: Cargoes of Two of Beaumarchais’s Ships Sent to America

  Appendix B: Chiefs of the Corps of Engineers, 1774–1893

  Notes

  Glossary

  Works Cited

  Bibliographic Essay

  i

  ii

  iii

  iv

  v

  vi

  vii

  viii

  ix

  x

  xi

  xii

  xiii

  xiv

  xv

  xvi

  1

  2

  3

  4

  5

  6

  7

  8

  9

  10

  11

  12

  13

  14

  15

  16

  17

  18

  19

  20

  21

  22

  23

  24

  25

  26

  27

  28

  29

  30

  31

  32

  33

  34

  35

  36

  37

  38

  39

  40

  41

  42

  43

  44

  45

  46

  47

  48

  49

  50

  51

  52

  53

  54

  55

  56

  57

  58

  59

  60

  61

  62

  63

  64

  65

  66

  67

  68

  69

  70

  71

  72

  73

  74

  75

  76

  77

  78

  79

  80

  81

  82

  83

  84

  85

  86

  87

  88

  89

  90

  91

  92

  93

  94

  95

  96

  97

  98

  99

  100

  101

  102

  103

  104

  105

  106

  107

  108

  109

  110

  111

  112

  113

  114

  115

  116

  117

  118

  119

  120

  121

  122

  123

  124

  125

  126

  127

  128

  129

  130

  131

  132

  133

  134

  135

  136

  137

  138

  139

  140

  141

  142

  143

  144

  145

  146

  147

  148

  149

  150

  151

  152

  153

  154

  155

  156

  157

  158

  159

  160

  161

  162

  163

  164

  165

  166

  167

  168

  169

  170

  171

  172

  173

  174

  175

  176

  177

  178

  179

  180

  181

  182

  183

  184

  185

  186

  187

  188

  189

  190

  191

  192

  193

  194

/>   195

  196

  197

  198

  199

  200

  201

  202

  203

  204

  205

  206

  207

  208

  209

  210

  211

  212

  213

  214

  215

  216

  217

  218

  219

  220

  221

  222

  223

  224

  225

  226

  227

  228

  229

  230

  231

  232

  233

  234

  235

  236

  237

  238

  239

  240

  241

  242

  243

  244

  245

  246

  247

  248

  249

  250

  251

  252

  253

  254

  255

  256

  257

  258

  259

  260

  261

  Guide

  Cover

  HalfTitle

  Title

  Copyright

  Contents

  Introduction

  Start of Content

  Appendix A: Cargoes of Two of Beaumarchais’s Ships Sent to America

  Appendix B: Chiefs of the Corps of Engineers, 1774–1893

  Notes

  Glossary

  Works Cited

  Bibliographic Essay

  INTRODUCTION

  Since the Battle of Hastings in 1066, the British and the French were archenemies; the French victory resulted in a French king ruling England for more than three centuries. In the eighteenth century, American colonists, being British subjects, shared the same prejudices and dislike of the French. Moreover, the French were also their enemy in the colonial wars, particularly the French and Indian War, which was begun by George Washington. As many of the colonists came to America to escape religious persecution, especially the Catholic Church’s Inquisition, they were loath to ally themselves with the French, most of whom were Catholic. So why did the Americans turn to France for assistance in their struggle for independence?

  Following the basic military principle “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” the colonists turned to France, hoping that she would desire to avenge her defeat in the French and Indian War and try to regain lost territory. Further, the French had the best military engineers, and the colonists desperately needed engineers. Sébastien Le Prestre de Vauban (1633–1707) was generally regarded as the best military engineer in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, his influence extending into the mid-nineteenth century.

  Military engineering in the eighteenth century combined the skills of the artilleryman and the engineer and focused on three main areas: fortification, artillery, and cartography. Defensive activities normally involved erecting small, temporary structures, such as earthwork batteries, at vulnerable points along the Atlantic coast and palisaded outposts along the interior frontier. Engineers also created less permanent field fortifications to provide advantage on the battlefield. They also reinforced and strengthened existing houses and constructed blockhouses. Examples of their work include those by British, Hessian, French, American, and Spanish engineers:)

  Fort Chambly, Île aux Noix, Les Cèdres, Louisbourg, and Québec (Canada)

  Fort Phoenix (Massachusetts))

  Fort Butts (Rhode Island))

  Fort Griswold (Connecticut))

  Forts Clinton/West Point, Montgomery, Niagara, Ontario, Salonga/Slongo, Stanwix/Schuyler, Stony Point, and Ticonderoga (New York)

  Fort Lee, Monmouth, Morristown, and Red Bank/Fort Mercer (New Jersey)

  Brandywine/Chadds Ford, Fort Mifflin, and Valley Forge (Pennsylvania)

  Yorktown (Virginia))

  Guilford Courthouse (North Carolina))

  Camden, Fort Dorchester, Fort Sullivan/Fort Moultrie, Kings Mountain, and Ninety Six (South Carolina)

  Fort George/Fort Morris and Spring Hill Redoubt (Georgia))

  Castillo de San Marcos (Florida))

  Fort Michilimackinac (Michigan))

  Fort Laurens (Ohio))

  Point Pleasant (West Virginia)

  As it was common to destroy fortifications when they were no longer needed, most of these examples are now reconstructions. A number of Revolutionary War–era fortifications were replaced by fortifications during the War of 1812 and the Civil War.

  An engineer’s main duty during battle was to command the artillery. He selected the type of shot (round, grape, canister, bar, sliding bar, chain, star, mortar/bomb) to be used and determined the size of the charge (amount of powder to use). He also calculated the distance and trajectory to the target.

  Cartographers in the military were known as topographical engineers, and their job essentially involved making maps. General Washington appointed Robert Erskine as “Geographer and Surveyor-General to the Continental Army” on July 19, 1777. He was commissioned as “Geographer and Surveyor to the Army of the United States” the following week, on July 27.

  The military engineer was the most difficult staff officer to obtain because of the highly technical skills required. American engineers knew a great deal about civil construction and could erect simple fieldworks, but their skills were not on par with those of formally trained European military engineers. American engineers created earthworks that the Crown forces sometimes chose not to attack, but they could not conduct a formal siege of a town. Their lack of skill turned operations into a mere blockade.

  Types of artillery shots. Photo courtesy of the author.

  Pierre-Augustin Caron de Beaumarchais (1732–1799), the son of King Louis XVI’s watchmaker and better known as playwright of The Barber of Seville and The Marriage of Figaro, wrote a lengthy memo to King Louis XVI on February 29, 1776, outlining why France should help America. He concluded, “[T]he saving of a few millions [livres or francs] to-day would surely result in the loss of more than 300 within two years.”1 He also emphasized the Americans’ need of arms, powder, and especially engineers, stressing that without engineers, the Americans could not even defend themselves, let alone win.2

  The Congressional Committee of Secret Correspondence appointed Silas Deane to the Secret Committee of Congress (which also included Benjamin Franklin, Benjamin Harrison, John Dickinson, John Hay, and Robert Morris). Deane was commissioned on March 2, 1776, “to go to France, there to transact such business, commercial and political as we have committed to his care, in behalf and by authority of the Congress of the thirteen united Colonies.”3

  PHILIPPE CHARLES JEAN BAPTISTE TRONSON DU COUDRAY

  Silas Deane and Benjamin Franklin were instructed to hire skilled professional soldiers in addition to soliciting material assistance as part of their diplomatic mission to France in the summer of 1776. Beaumarchais and Jean-Baptiste Vaquette de Gribeauval (1715–1789), the leading artillery expert of the century, advised Deane to contract Philippe Charles Jean Baptiste Tronson du Coudray (1738–1777), one of Gribeauval’s protégés, to organize and lead a group of volunteers to America. Despite his extravagant claims, du Coudray was actually a military theorist whose rank was equivalent to that of an artillery major. Deane granted him a generous contract promising him essentially a free hand in artillery and engineer operations and the title of general of artillery and ordnance.

  Meanwhile, Beaumarchais, operating under the corporate name of Roderigue Hortalez et Cie., wrote to the Committee of Secret Correspondence on August 18, 1776, to tell them that the company was founded for the sole purpose of serving them in Europe to meet all their needs there and to see that all th
e goods, cloth, canvas, powder, munitions, guns, cannons, and even some gold to pay the troops could be obtained rapidly and under concession. Whenever possible, Beaumarchais would remove any obstacle that European politics might present. He also told Deane and Franklin that he had procured about 200 bronze four-pounders, which he would send at the earliest opportunity, along with 200,000 pounds of cannon powder; 20,000 excellent guns; some bronze mortars, bombs, cannonballs, and bayonets; plates, cloth, linen, and so on to clothe the troops; and some lead to make musket balls. He also found an artillery and engineer officer who would leave for Philadelphia before the arrival of the first shipment, accompanied by lieutenants and officers, artillerymen, gunners, and so on.4

  Franklin conveyed du Coudray’s request to the Comte de Saint-Germain, the French minister of war, in December 1776. Saint-Germain allowed four French engineers to volunteer for service in America: Louis le Bègue de Presle Duportail; Louis-Guillaume-Servais des Hayes de La Radière; Jean-Baptiste de Gouvion; and Jean Baptiste Joseph, Comte de Laumoy.

  Du Coudray embarked for America with twenty-nine officers and twelve sergeants of artillery, with assurances from the commissioners that he would be commissioned a major general and given command of the artillery. The group arrived in Philadelphia in May 1777, but some American generals resisted du Coudray’s appointment. They were reluctant to appoint a Frenchman as commander of artillery above American general officers. Generals John Sullivan, Nathanael Greene, and Henry Knox wrote to Congress on July 1, expressing their reservations. Sullivan threatened to resign his commission if du Coudray were promoted over Knox. Congress reacted on July 3 by resolving that the

  president inform General Sullivan that Congress have not been accustomed to be controlled by their officers in the measures which they are about to take in discharge of the important trust committed to them by the United States; that they mean not to be controlled by his letter in their proceedings respecting Monsr. du Coudray; for that whatever those proceedings may be, General Sullivan’s resignation will be accepted by Congress whenever he shall think it proper to transmit it to them.5

  Congress also directed General Washington

  to let those officers know that Congress consider the said letters as an attempt to influence their decisions, and an invasion of the liberties of the people, and indicating a want of confidence in the justice of Congress; that it is expected by Congress the said officers will make proper acknowledgments for an interference of so dangerous a tendency; but if any of those officers are unwilling to serve their country under the authority of Congress they shall be at liberty to resign their commissions and retire.6

  Congress appointed a committee on July 15 to meet with du Coudray to inform him that the agreement offered by Silas Deane could not be carried out, but Congress would “cheerfully give him such rank and appointments as shall not be inconsistent with the honour and safety of these States, or interfere with the great duties they owe to their constituents.”7 The committee delivered its report to Congress on July 21, requesting that du Coudray